GhostCrew
Comparison · updated 7 Sep 2026

Automated company vs. S.A.S. vs. DAO vs. the US DAO laws

The Argentine bill is not a Wyoming copy, and you do not need it to run a company with AI. The table that settles both.

Automated company vs. S.A.S. vs. DAO vs. Wyoming, Tennessee and Utah

Status as of September 7, 2026. The Argentine sociedad automatizada is a bill in Senate committee, not law. Every row about it describes the proposed text plus the amendments announced in committee, and can still change. Nothing here is legal advice.

The one-paragraph answer

They solve different problems. The Argentine automated company is about who runs the business: AI agents execute the corporate purpose, with no employees required for ordinary operations and at least one human responsible person. The US DAO statutes (Wyoming 2021, Tennessee 2022, Utah 2023) are about how owners govern: decisions and ownership recorded on a blockchain, wrapped in a limited-liability entity. The plain Argentine S.A.S. is the vehicle that exists today and can already be run by software in fact — it just does not say so on the tin. If you need something incorporable this quarter, the S.A.S. is the only Argentine option; if you need statutory recognition that the operation is autonomous, only the Argentine bill offers it, and it is not in force.

Side by side

Automated company (Argentina, bill)Plain S.A.S. (Argentina, in force)DAO (Argentina, same bill)Wyoming DAO LLC (US, 2021)Tennessee DO LLC (US, 2022)Utah LLD (US, 2024)
Can you form one today?No — Senate committee, no vote yetYes — Law 27.349 (2017)No — same billYes — W.S. 17-31, in force since Jul 1, 2021Yes — LLC Act amended in 2022Yes — H.B. 357 (2023), effective Jan 1, 2024
What is automatedThe operation: AI agents carry out the corporate purposeNothing by statute — automation is a private factThe governance: rules and votes run by protocolGovernance and/or management by smart contractGovernance by smart contract (“decentralized organization”)Governance by protocol; the LLD is its own entity type
Legal personalityYes — a quality of an S.A., S.R.L. or S.A.S.YesYes — separate personality proposedYes — an LLCYes — an LLCYes — a new entity, not an LLC
OwnershipOrdinary shares or quotasOrdinary sharesTokens or cryptographic units on a distributed ledgerMembership interests, may be tokenizedMembership interests, may be tokenizedMembership on-chain, recorded by the protocol
Humans requiredAt least one human responsible person in the administration body (amendment announced Aug 19, 2026)Directors must be individuals; single-shareholder allowedLegal representation must be vested in one or more individualsA registered agent in Wyoming; algorithmic management allowedA registered agent in TennesseeA registered agent in Utah; no manager requirement
Employees requiredNo — the definition presupposes none for ordinary operationsNo minimum — Argentine law never required employeesNoNoNoNo
Disclosure in the name“Automatizada” in the company name + declaration in bylawsNoneIdentifies as DAO“DAO”, “LAO” or “DAO LLC” in the name“DO” identifier under the amended Act“LLD” designation
Who is liable for harm caused by the software (detail)The company with all of its assets; directors keep the art. 102 duty of configuration and supervision of the system and its results — four verbs in ICBT’s reading: select, configure, supervise and audit the AIOrdinary regime today: strict liability for risky activities (art. 1757 CCyC) + veil-piercing (art. 54, Law 19.550)The company; representatives answer under general rulesMembers shielded like any LLC; the smart contract governs internallyMembers shielded like any LLCMembers shielded; statute limits liability to on-chain assets in some cases
RegistryPublic registry of the domicile (IGJ in Buenos Aires City, provincial registries elsewhere)SameSameWyoming Secretary of StateTennessee Secretary of StateUtah Division of Corporations
Designed forSoftware, content and digital-service businesses run by agents, founders who want the operation recognized as autonomousAny small company; today’s practical vehicle for an AI-run businessToken-governed communities and protocolsToken-governed communities and protocolsSameSame, with an entity type built from scratch

Sources for the US column: Wyoming SF0038 (2021), Utah H.B. 357 (2023), Tennessee HB 2645 (2022), Proskauer’s three-state overview. Sources for the Argentine columns: Law 27.349 (S.A.S.), Bruchou & Funes on the bill, La Nación on the Aug 19 amendment.

The three confusions this table fixes

  1. “Argentina is copying Wyoming.” It is not. Wyoming, Tennessee and Utah wrote statutes for DAOs — governance by blockchain — and the Argentine bill has its own DAO chapter for that. The automated company is a separate figure with no US equivalent: it regulates a company whose day-to-day work is done by AI agents, not one whose votes happen on-chain. The DAO chapter, topic by topic, is in DAOs in the Argentine bill.
  2. “You need the new law to run a company with AI and no employees.” You do not. No Argentine rule requires employees, so an S.A.S. formed today can already operate through software. What the bill adds is recognition (the automated quality in the name and bylaws), specific duties over the AI, and a mandatory human responsible person. Our guide on incorporating an S.A.S. today covers how to draft it so the future conversion is a bylaw amendment.
  3. “The automated company means AI gets legal personhood.” No statute on either continent does that. In every column, the legal person is the company; the AI or the smart contract is the tool it operates or governs with.

Which one should you pick right now?

  • You are in Argentina (or want an Argentine entity) and need to operate this year: a plain S.A.S., drafted for conversion. Follow the bill tracker for the committee vote.
  • Your product is a token-governed protocol: a US DAO vehicle is available today; Wyoming has the longest track record, Utah the most purpose-built entity.
  • You want statutory recognition of an AI-operated company: nothing is available anywhere yet. Argentina’s bill is the only one on the table; the realistic window for the first incorporations is the second half of 2027 (see where the bill stands).

Main sources

Get told the day you can actually incorporate one

Three emails, no newsletter: committee vote, enactment, and the day registries open the door.

One email at the committee vote, one at enactment, one when registries open.